To do this I must be able to notice and name the types of evidence and use strategies to help me find claim and evaluate the effectiveness of the author's argument.
I will demonstrate this by annotating for types of evidence and answering all the questions about the article (article below).
Directions: Read/annotate for five types of evidence and follow instructions on the article.
OP-ED
CONTRIBUTOR
Suicide by Choice? Not So Fast
By Ben Mattlin New York Times October 31, 2012
NEXT week, voters in Massachusetts will decide whether
to adopt an assisted-suicide law. I
ought to support the effort, but as a lifelong disabled person, I cannot.
There are solid
arguments in favor. No one will be coerced into taking a poison pill,
supporters insist. The “right to die” will apply only to those with six months
to live or less. Doctors will take into account the possibility of depression.
Fair enough, but I
remain skeptical (unsure). There’s
been little evidence of abuse so far in Oregon, Washington and Montana, the
three states where physician-assisted death is already legal, but abuse —
whether spousal, child or elder — is notoriously underreported, and evidence is
difficult to come by. What’s more, Massachusetts registered nearly 20,000 cases
of elder abuse in 2010 alone.
My problem, ultimately,
is this: I’ve lived so close to death for so long that I know how thin the
border between coercion (being persuaded;
forced) and free choice is, how easy it is for someone to inadvertently
influence you to feel devalued and hopeless — to pressure you ever so slightly
but decidedly into being “reasonable,” to unburdening others, to “letting go.”
Perhaps, as advocates
contend, you can’t understand why anyone would push for assisted-suicide
legislation until you’ve seen a loved one suffer. But you also can’t truly
conceive of the many subtle forces — invariably well meaning, kindhearted, even
gentle, yet as persuasive as a tsunami — that emerge when your physical autonomy
is hopelessly compromised.
I was born with a
congenital neuromuscular weakness called spinal muscular atrophy. I’ve never
walked or stood or had much use of my hands. Roughly half the babies who
exhibit symptoms as I did don’t live past age 2. Not only did I survive, but
the progression of my disease slowed dramatically when I was about 6 years old,
astounding doctors. Today, at nearly 50, I’m a husband, father, journalist and
author.
Yet I’m more fragile now
than I was in infancy. No longer able to hold a pencil, I’m writing this with a
voice-controlled computer. Every swallow of food, sometimes every breath, can
become a battle. And a few years ago, when a surgical blunder put me into a
coma from septic shock, the doctors seriously questioned whether it was worth
trying to extend my life. My existence seemed pretty tenuous anyway, they
figured. They didn’t know about my family, my career, my aspirations.
Would
the author have been a good candidate for assisted suicide? ____________
Why?_______________________________________________________________________
Fortunately, they asked
my wife, who knows exactly how I feel. She convinced them to proceed “full
code,” as she’s learned to say, to keep me alive using any and all means
necessary.
From this I learned how
easy it is to be perceived as someone whose quality of life is untenable (not able to me maintained), even or
perhaps especially by doctors. Indeed, I hear it from them all the time — “How
have you survived so long? Wow, you must put up with a lot!” — even during
routine office visits, when all I’ve asked for is an antibiotic for a sinus
infection. Strangers don’t treat me this way, but doctors feel entitled to
render judgments and voice their opinions. To them, I suppose, I must represent
a failure of their profession, which is shortsighted. I am more than my
diagnosis and my prognosis.
What
do doctors think of the author?____________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
This is but one of many
invisible forces of coercion. Others include that certain look of exhaustion in
a loved one’s eyes, or the way nurses and friends sigh in your presence while
you’re zoned out in a hospital bed. All these can cast a dangerous cloud of
depression upon even the most cheery of optimists, a situation clinicians might
misread since, to them, it seems perfectly rational.
And in a sense, it is
rational, given the dearth of alternatives. If nobody wants you at the party,
why should you stay? Advocates of Death With Dignity laws who say that patients
themselves should decide whether to live or die are fantasizing. Who chooses
suicide in a vacuum (without influence)? We
are inexorably affected by our immediate environment. The deck is stacked.
How
could a “loved one’s look of exhaustion” or if “nobody wants you at the party”
persuade one to pick assisted suicide? __________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Yes, that may sound
paranoid. After all, the Massachusetts proposal calls for the lethal dose to be
“self-administered,” which it defines as the “patient’s act of ingesting.” You
might wonder how that would apply to those who can’t feed themselves — people
like me. But as I understand the legislation, there is nothing to prevent the
patient from designating just about anyone to feed them the poison pill.
Indeed, there is no requirement for oversight of the ingestion at all; no one
has to witness how and when the lethal drug is given. Which, to my mind, leaves
even more room for abuse.
To be sure, there are
noble intentions behind the “assisted death” proposals, but I can’t help
wondering why we’re in such a hurry to ensure the right to die before we’ve
done all we can to ensure that those of us with severe, untreatable,
life-threatening conditions are given the same open-hearted welcome, the same
open-minded respect and the same open-ended opportunities due everyone else.
11. Is the author for or against assisted
suicide? 2) Underline and label the
author’s claim. 3) what are the authors
best supporting statements (star them)
No comments:
Post a Comment